Friday, 27 April 2007

Film Review, The Russia House


Film Review by Anna Peña Vicent

Film Title: The Russia House

Country / year: USA, 1990

Genre: Drama/ thriller

Director: Fred Schepisi.

Cast: Sean Connery, Michelle Pfeiffer, Roy Sheider, James Fox, Klaus Maria Brandauer.

Type of language used: British and American English.

Plot:

Bartholomew “Barley” Scott Blair is a british publisher who regularly attends book sales fairs in Moscow. One day, a soviet writer sends him a manuscript containing information about the soviet nuclear capabilities and their atomic weapons and asking him to publish it.
The book is intercepted by the British intelligence and with the American co-operation forces Barley to contact the mysterious writer and verify if the documents are true or is just a trick to confuse the enemies.
Blair, who has been always very fond of the Russian people values, doesn’t want to take part of this “game” but he is compelled to do it and there is no chance for him.
But everything changes when he meets the russian writer’s contact, a beautiful soviet woman called Katia. Blair is immediately attracted to Katia and then he has to choose between finishing his fact-finding mission or betraying his country to save Katia and her family.

Analysis:

Adaptation of John Le Carre’s novel on the world of the international espionage and its hypocrisy, the pacifist values of the human being as well as his ambiguity and contradiction. But over all, is a love story which is capable of piercing all the ideologies and that is totally unpredictable.
The soundtrack is brilliant and essential in order to submerge the spectator into the story. This, joined with the excellent photography in a range of grey and blue scenes provides the film with a necessary touch of melancholy and romanticism.
All the actors play a good role, specially Sean Connery who gives one of the best performances of his career.

Opinion:

In my opinion is a really good and entertaining film to see it and takes part of my private film library. Maybe some people can find it a bit characterless and mushy because the love story reduces leadership to spying.
I think it could be a good film for men and women as equal. At least give the chance to watch it and I hope you won’t regret it.

Monday, 9 April 2007

Film Review: The Illusionist


The Illusionist

Country/Year: USA 2006

Genre: Drama

Director: Neil Burger

Producers: Brian Koppelman, David Levien, Michael London, Bob Yari, Cathy Schulman

Cast: Edward Norton, Paul Giamatti, Jessica Biel, Rufus Sewell

The Old Story with a New Trick

A poor young boy falls in love with a pretty aristocrat girl, but the class differences makes the relationship impossible.

Years later, the boy (now a handsome man) and the girl (now a beautiful lady and fiancée of the future emperor of Austria) meet again and love reappears.

It sounds very typical? Well and it is, except for the fact that the boy turns out to be an incredible magician.

Plot:

In The Illusionist , Edwar Norton plays the role of Eisenheim an illusionist of great talent with a wonderful show that is captivating the audience of Vienna in the last years of the XIX century. Inspector Uhl (played by Paul Giammati) tries to uncover the tricks of Eisenheim, first by mere interest, but after a show in which Eisenheim and Shopie (Jessica Biel) meet again after a long time, by order of the Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewel) who wants inspector Uhl to uncover Eisenheim’s tricks.

Unfortunately for Prince Leopold , instead of unmasking the tricks of Eisenheim, Inspector Uhl discovers that Shopie and Eisenheim are lovers…

Opinion:

While the story itself is not very original there are several features that make this movie remarkable. First and foremost is the outstanding quality of the photography. It is really beautiful and catches perfectly the atmosphere of Vienna and its theatres. Second is the wonderful acting of Paul Giammati, particularly when he is together with Edward Norton.

On the other hand, I must say that although The Illusionist is an entertaining movie, perfect for a Sunday evening, it has an important flaw. The end is quite predictable, so if you expect a final and surprising twist you can be quite disappointed because even a skilled Illusionist like Eisenheim can’t change the outcome of a classical story.